CrossFit Discussion Board  

Go Back   CrossFit Discussion Board > Community > CrossPit
CrossFit Home Forum Site Rules CrossFit FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

CrossPit For discussing MMA, UFC, Pride fighting, and other martial arts

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-16-2011, 06:47 PM   #1
Chu Kim
Member Chu Kim is offline
 
Chu Kim's Avatar
 
Profile:
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Fort Wayne  IN
Posts: 16
MMA Vs Boxing

Yes, we all know that MMA fighters have a big edge when it comes to downright fighting when going up against boxers (or must of us assume so). My question is, when it comes down to it, which profession produces the superior athletes overall, MMA or Boxing? This is in terms of all the major areas, strength, speed, stamina, and also toughness and gymnastics-type abilities. Which, in general, is the better conditioned and more athletic of the two?
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2011, 09:36 PM   #2
Doug Blankenship
Member Doug Blankenship is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Las Vegas  NV
Posts: 1,306
Re: MMA Vs Boxing

Both Boxing and MMA produce amazing athletes but it does come down to the fighter and what test they would be ran through to tell who is the better overall athlete.

I would lean towards MMA fighters though.

Last edited by Doug Blankenship : 09-16-2011 at 09:48 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2011, 01:16 AM   #3
Pearse Shields
Member Pearse Shields is offline
 
Pearse Shields's Avatar
 
Profile:
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Palmerston  New Zealand
Posts: 1,798
Re: MMA Vs Boxing

A boxer who can handle a 12-round fight and go the distance is an incredible athlete. The same can be said for a 5 round MMA champ. They each have to work at different things, are slightly different athletes, and in my opinion, are separated just enough that comparisons would be unfair.

I'd have to say though, I'm probably more impressed by the boxer in this case.
__________________
If it had parents, eat it till you're full My YouTube
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2011, 09:24 PM   #4
David Meverden
Member David Meverden is offline
 
David Meverden's Avatar
 
Profile:
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Charleston  SC
Posts: 2,802
Re: MMA Vs Boxing

I define being fit as being useful at all kinds of tasks and producing a good work output at nearly anything. Using that definition I think that (speaking in broad stereotypes, individuals will vary) boxers would be somewhat better at endurance tests, but that MMA guys will be fitter overall due to the much broader set of demands. The grappling side of MMA demands that the athlete develop balance, strength, and explosive movements for all kinds of positions on the ground and while tied up with opponents.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 12:59 AM   #5
Katherine Derbyshire
Member Katherine Derbyshire is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Seattle  WA
Posts: 7,596
Re: MMA Vs Boxing

On the other hand, one could argue that any sport in which head injuries are not merely incidental (as in football) but are deliberately inflicted is inherently anti-fitness.

Katherine
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 12:47 PM   #6
Wayne Riddle
Member Wayne Riddle is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lewiston  ME
Posts: 1,779
Re: MMA Vs Boxing

Not relevant, two different sports with different training goals and different requirements to be considered "superior" at their sport. Taking a professional athlete that specializes at something then try to argue in the general realm at how they do is comparing apples to oranges.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2011, 11:43 AM   #7
Becca Borawski
Affiliate Becca Borawski is offline
 
Becca Borawski's Avatar
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Portland  OR
Posts: 1,231
Re: MMA Vs Boxing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Katherine Derbyshire View Post
On the other hand, one could argue that any sport in which head injuries are not merely incidental (as in football) but are deliberately inflicted is inherently anti-fitness.

Katherine
One could argue that ALL competitive sports are anti-fitness, head trauma or not.

In regards to the OP's question, though, I agree with a couple other of the posters. It is both apples and oranges between boxers and MMA fighters and apples and oranges even between MMA fighters themselves. Depending on their background and specialization even within MMA, they will have vary different athletic capacities.
__________________
Becca Borawski
Managing Editor - www.breakingmuscle.com

www.crossfitla.com -- www.modernathena.com -- www.nerdjockprincess.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2011, 10:38 PM   #8
Chu Kim
Member Chu Kim is offline
 
Chu Kim's Avatar
 
Profile:
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Fort Wayne  IN
Posts: 16
Re: MMA Vs Boxing

I personally am of the opinion that different sports can produce higher and lower levels of general athletic fitness. There are sports that may require greater overall demands on the body in one or more major areas, or have a greater range of athletic requirements. Every sport is different, and will require you to develop a unique set of abilities, but some sports can certainly be categorized as more athletic in overall terms. I could be wrong, and it could be all "apples aned oranges", but what seems to clearly contradict that stance are the different levels of overall fitness between pro darts players and Olympic decathletes, for one example. Just google for images the phrase "champion darts players" and you will understand what I mean. Go ahead. Take a good look, and then ask yourself if the "apples and oranges" argument is valid. I didn't think so.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2011, 06:38 AM   #9
Wayne Riddle
Member Wayne Riddle is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lewiston  ME
Posts: 1,779
Re: MMA Vs Boxing

Again, taking a general term and applying it to specialization doesn't work. Yup I would say an Olympic level sprinter is probably more "athletic" then a world champion dart player, but has the dart player developed the required skills for their sport to the highest levels possible?

Now if you want to talk about weekend warriors going out and doing some type of sport to stay fit then that is a totally different discussion.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2011, 05:33 PM   #10
David Meverden
Member David Meverden is offline
 
David Meverden's Avatar
 
Profile:
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Charleston  SC
Posts: 2,802
Re: MMA Vs Boxing

I don't see anything wrong with asking what kind of sport produces a more well rounded and fit athlete. It doesn't have to be some kind of value judgement. Positing an opinion that training for Rugby makes a more rounded and fit individual than a shot putter doesn't mean that Rugby is better or a more valid sport.

I really like boxing and am not a big fan of grappling, but I can still take part in a discussion of the relative fitness merits to training for each.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Adapting boxing to muay thai and MMA? Danim Suer CrossPit 5 05-13-2010 03:22 AM
Boxing Harry Mott CrossPit 30 05-02-2008 02:25 PM
Boxing Help Jared Grisham Fitness 20 12-05-2007 10:02 PM
Wanting to get into boxing, possibly mma Justin Chandler CrossPit 6 08-29-2007 11:06 AM
Boxing in MD/DC/VA Steven Manns CrossPit 8 07-09-2006 09:02 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CrossFit is a registered trademark of CrossFit Inc.