CrossFit Discussion Board  

Go Back   CrossFit Discussion Board > CrossFit Forum > Nutrition
CrossFit Home Forum Site Rules CrossFit FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Nutrition Diet, supplements, weightloss, health & longevity

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-23-2005, 01:19 PM   #1
Brent Hammond
Member Brent Hammond is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Lawton  OK
Posts: 4
I see that The Zone is very popular here. I was wondering if anyone can attest to the accuracy of the body fat calculator on Dr. Sears' website. I am a 36-year-old male. My height is 5'10", waist is 36", and wrist is 7". According to Dr. Sears' calculator my body fat is 16%, or just over 34 pounds. I have gotten fairly consistent readings from my digital calipers that puts my body fat at 23%, or about 49.5 pounds. After checking a few height/weight charts, I see that I'm more than 50 pounds overweight.
My original goal was to try to lose around 40 pounds of fat to get to 175. Of course that doesn't take into account any muscle weight I would like to gain. If I follow Dr. Sears' calculator, my original goal of 40 pounds of fat lost will be too much. Am I missing something here? Is 40 pounds too much for me to lose? Do I need to readjust my goal, or am I just thinking about this all wrong?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2005, 01:57 PM   #2
Patrick Walsh
Member Patrick Walsh is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Santa Cruz  CA
Posts: 84
this probably won't help much, but the Zone calculator tells me I'm @ 10% BF. My Tanita scale tells me my BF is ~16%.

I'm 6'1" 182lbs w/ a 32 inch waist and a 7" wrist.

I don't know which is more accurate, but I shure hope it's the zone calculator :-)
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2005, 05:06 PM   #3
Beth Moscov
Member Beth Moscov is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Boulder Creek  CA
Posts: 1,269
Tanita scales are notorious for being off by as much as 10% or so. I don't know about digital calipers. The zone calculater is limited by the quality of measurements you take. It is really easy to pull that tape a bit tighter around the waist when you subconsciously don't want to see the actual size of your stomach! The most accurate body fat measurement is underwater weighing. The best thing to do is to stick with one measurement to moniter that your body fat is going in the right direction. Then if your really worried about it, get an underwater weighing and compare it to your favored measure to keep track.

Ultimately, none of them are perfect so you need to keep good records of your results from the zone diet on a daily basis. This becomes the "art" part of fitness - learning how well your own body responds to various diets, exercises, etc. And you can only tell if you keep records - at least occasionally - cause we tend to not remember correctly or at least not everything.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2005, 05:33 PM   #4
Veronica Carpenter
Affiliate Veronica Carpenter is offline
 
Veronica Carpenter's Avatar
 
Profile:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oroville  CA
Posts: 2,709
Hydrostatic measurement is only as accurate as the subjects ability to expel all his/her air while underwater. It's not so easy.

Tanita or bio-electrical impedence scale measurements can vary depending on your hydration levels.

And since fat is distributed differently in each person, the more caliper sites measured the more accurate BF% measurement will be.

The most effective way of measuring BF% would be to track your measurements over time to see if there is a reduction. Do this by employing the same method with the same person taking the measurements. This is assuming the person knows how to take measurements.

I prefer looking in the mirror and seeing how my clothes fit. The only numbers that matter to me are my competition totals and occassionally the scale if I'm trying to make a weight class. :biggrin:


  Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2005, 07:31 PM   #5
Steve Shafley
Banned Steve Shafley is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Saginaw  MI
Posts: 508
You can find cheap calipers.
Take 3-4 measurements at standard places, track these, along with bodyweight, and you'll get a nice snapshot of what's coming off where, and if you are still losing fat.

The combination of calipers, the scale, and the mirror make it hard to fool yourself. But not impossible.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2005, 02:20 AM   #6
Steven C. Herndon
Departed Steven C. Herndon is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jan 1970
 
Posts: 51
Ignore the height/ weight charts, goverment b.m.i. chart, etc. These do not take into account a heavily muscled person. I recently saw a list celebrities that are considered overweight by the b.m.i. list, and it included people like Vin Diesel, The Rock and Tom Cruise.From what I have read, I would go more by either calipers or tape messure and especially the mirror and how your clothes fit.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2005, 10:14 AM   #7
Robert Wolf
Member Robert Wolf is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chico  CA
Posts: 2,669
If one is doing serious strength training the obliques and trunk muscles are going to be more developed than what these tables take into account. The Sears site puts me at 20%!

Despite this the Sears site is only 1 block off of what I need so it is interesting that a farily large dicrepancy in actual BF% does not alter the prescription that much.
Robb
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2005, 02:00 PM   #8
Brent Hammond
Member Brent Hammond is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Lawton  OK
Posts: 4
Guess I was missing something after all. I was basing my calculations on the waist measurement of my pants. When I actually measured my waist, the results were much different. My new calculations showed 24% BF, or 51.6 pounds. That makes more sense. I guess when all else fails, try doing it the right way.:uhoh:
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2005, 07:50 AM   #9
Larry Lindenman
Affiliate Larry Lindenman is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago  Illinois
Posts: 2,769
Just a note: Robb is about 5-7% BF based only on his pictures...if not lower! He is ripped. That being said, 36" waist at 5'10" would probably put you in the overfat range. If you could see a six pack go with 5-7% a 4 pack 10-12% a no pack >15. Not scientific but what the heck. Check the search engine, I posted an article on bodyfat testing about 3 months ago.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Confused and need help Jeff Dawson Starting 7 06-21-2007 04:35 AM
Now I'm just confused William Winger Nutrition 1 08-10-2006 05:27 PM
Confused about fat 3x, 4x, etc Frank Menendez Nutrition 13 04-25-2006 04:54 AM
Confused about MSG!!! Peter Queen Nutrition 0 03-02-2006 10:33 AM
A little confused Josh Brehm Equipment 1 09-15-2005 01:12 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CrossFit is a registered trademark of CrossFit Inc.