CrossFit Discussion Board  

Go Back   CrossFit Discussion Board > CrossFit Forum > Exercises
CrossFit Home Forum Site Rules CrossFit FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Exercises Movements, technique & proper execution

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-20-2007, 04:02 PM   #1
Gregory William Van Giezen
Member Gregory William Van Giezen is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Augusta  GA
Posts: 1
This has most likely been asked to death, but is there a huge difference between the two squats? The reason I ask is that I have a home gym in the spare bedroom without a squat rack, and getting the barbell to the front rack is easiest to do for me. I am trying to improve my pistols, so I thought deep squats would help. Will front squats do the trick, or should I put my building shoes on?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2007, 05:25 PM   #2
Brandon Oto
Member Brandon Oto is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Cruz  CA
Posts: 3,001
I understand that they're considered very different, but I don't know why either. I'd like to hear a good explanation.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2007, 06:04 PM   #3
Scott Allen Hanson
Member Scott Allen Hanson is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Idaho Falls  Idaho
Posts: 1,008
I'm not an expert, but there is a significant difference. In the front squat, the weight is obviously racked on the front of the shoulders. This requires a very erect torso to prevent dumping the weight and to keep the weight in the frontal plane (an imaginary plane through the body around which the body weight and load must remain balanced). The front squat is a skill transfer exercise for the clean.

In contrast, the back squat has the bar trapped against the upper back and lower on the torso, so that the moment about the lower back is less for a given angle of torso to floor. Most people can lift significantly higher loads with back squats, placing greater overall stress on the body. Back squats also seem to work the posterior chain (esp hamstrings) more effectively.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2007, 07:20 AM   #4
Gerhard Lavin
Member Gerhard Lavin is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Berlin  Germany
Posts: 973
A high bar narrow stance Olympic style back squat is very similar to a front squat. A low bar Power style back squat is very different. The latter style will allow you to utilize much more weight than a FS.

However if you're doing heavy FS with a full range of motion you'll be getting most of the benefit. With full ROM your hamstrings will be worked. If there not cleans and deads will take of them.

Plus if your working out alone the FS is safer as it's easier to dump the bar.

Ger
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2007, 02:01 PM   #5
Gorm Laursen
Member Gorm Laursen is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Copenhagen  ...
Posts: 274
I had a hard time front squating when I first took it up. Now I'm almost equally strong in both forms. PR back squat is 115 kilos and PR in front squat is 105 kilos.

Front squatting and pistols is a great combo and utterly sufficient.

(Message edited by gormus on June 22, 2007)
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Front squat vs. Back squat Joseph Martin Exercises 3 07-21-2007 10:48 AM
Sport Functionality: Front Squat or Back Squat Tim Ulcoq Exercises 3 04-09-2007 01:23 PM
Front squat saver than back squat ? Israel Halperin Exercises 8 10-06-2006 06:10 AM
Front Squat vs. Back Squat Alex McClung Exercises 6 02-08-2005 09:12 AM
Back squat or front squat Gregory Spilson Exercises 9 09-22-2004 07:15 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CrossFit is a registered trademark of CrossFit Inc.