CrossFit Discussion Board  

Go Back   CrossFit Discussion Board > Community > Community
CrossFit Home Forum Site Rules CrossFit FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Community Catch all category for CrossFit community discussion.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-11-2008, 09:02 PM   #511
Phillip Garrison
Banned Phillip Garrison is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mesa  AZ
Posts: 1,382
Re: T-Nation, Shugart and the Truth About CrossFit

I was hoping this thread would finally die
 
Old 12-11-2008, 11:05 PM   #512
Shane Skowron
Member Shane Skowron is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Queens  NY
Posts: 3,800
Re: T-Nation, Shugart and the Truth About CrossFit

Coach, thanks for clarifying your position on the 500-750# deadlift issue. I think we were all speculating about what that really meant.
 
Old 12-12-2008, 05:41 AM   #513
Bob Long
Member Bob Long is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Bruning  NE
Posts: 234
Re: T-Nation, Shugart and the Truth About CrossFit

asymptote  /ˈćsɪmˌtoʊt/ [as-im-toht]

–noun Mathematics. a straight line approached by a given curve as one of the variables in the equation of the curve approaches infinity.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Origin:
1650–60; < Gk asýmptōtos, equiv. to a- a- 6 + sýmptōtos falling together (sym- sym- + ptōtós falling, deriv. of ptō-, var. s. of píptein to fall + -tos verbid suffix)

Ok, I know I'm the village idiot around here, but how does the word coach used "asymptote" relate to working out? (Keep it simple, single sylable words only, please.)
 
Old 12-12-2008, 06:16 AM   #514
Jake Tingley
Member Jake Tingley is offline
 
Jake Tingley's Avatar
 
Profile:
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Concord  NH
Posts: 21
Re: T-Nation, Shugart and the Truth About CrossFit

He just means that people could approach but probably won't exceed 750#
 
Old 12-12-2008, 06:27 AM   #515
Coach
Founding Father Coach is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Aug 2003
 
Posts: 391
Re: T-Nation, Shugart and the Truth About CrossFit

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jared Ashley View Post
yeah... it's a recurring over-simplification of a claim with it's root in truth.

The true statement: No athlete has ever reached elite status in their sport training exclusively GPP.

The exaggeration: CF/GPP might be fun, but it's useless to the athlete.

the flip side of this argument comes from the WOD nazi's:

The true statement: GPP is an integral part of nearly all athletic endeavours, and CF is an excellent resource to supplement a training program.

The exaggeration: CF makes you awesome at everything. If you want to win, just shut up and do the WOD.
I think that’s very good, Jared.

I’ve never heard anyone say that CrossFit is a substitute for training in your sport. This is a strawman. I’d be embarrassed to utter it, and Poliquin ought to be embarrassed to present it. It’s dishonest. It’s unfair. We teased Mark Twight for floating this strawman on these very pages with the observation that “Mark Twight has discovered that you have to do your sport to get good at it.”

Has Poliquin still not gotten over the Yanks coming to his Canada and taking the soldiers at the Canadian Infantry School from him? We got two times the results in half the time by a handful of easy and critical metrics. Now he’s pretending to have advanced understanding of endocrinology. I wonder if he’s given up on his baking soda and vomiting regimen? That’s what he had the Canadian soldiers doing. It’s sad to see a guy, once a reasonably good coach, get older and hungry, fearful, I guess, of eating dog food in retirement, start scamming the public with pseudo science and supplements. Damn that’s ugly. As a strong and reliable rule, good coaches are selling their knowledge neither pills nor contraptions.

For the record: If you want to get at snowboarding, you’ll have to snowboard. If you want to get good at tennis, you’ll have to play tennis. If you want to get good at Jiu-jitsu, you’ll have to do jiu-jitsu. If you want to get good at baseball you’ll have to play baseball. If you want to get good at swimming, you’ll have to swim. If you want to be good at playing the violin, you’ll have to play the violin. If you want to get good at chess, you’ll have to play chess. If you want to get good at physics, you’ll have to do physics. If you want to get good at X, you’ll have to do X. I sincerely hope a pattern has emerged here that the likes of Poliquin can wrap themselves around.

Here’s what we know about CrossFit, GPP, sport training, and athletic development:

• GPP is the most underdeveloped and neglected aspect of athletic training, especially in elite athletes.

• CrossFit produces an unmatched GPP in novice, intermediate, and advanced athletes regardless of their prior training and sport.

• Every athlete we’ve worked with, from Olympic medalists, to UFC legends, has some glaring chink in his/her GPP, and it takes, at most two hours, two sessions, on average to find these chinks.

• Fixing these chinks, these deficiencies, has immediate benefit within your sport and very often in ways not quite obvious mechanically and perhaps metabolically. For instance, more pull-ups makes for better skiing and skiers. Upper body pushing-movements makes for better rowing and rowers. Anaerobic training is a boon to endurance athletes.

• There’s greater margin for improving performance in elite athletes, where the margins of victory are very tight, improving GPP with CrossFit than can be garnered through additional sport specific training.

• “CrossFit produces a “ready-state” from which more advanced or sport specific training becomes very efficient.” – Mark Twight

• CrossFit, will for many sports reduce the total training volume, reduce training injuries, and allow more time for vital sport specific skills and drills.

• CrossFit is more fun and seems more athletic to experienced athletes than does traditional GPP.

• CrossFit has athletes improving their fitness for years beyond, to levels significantly beyond, traditional GPP.

• Sport training and physiology are not so well understood that highly specialized strength and conditioning routines are optimally effective.

Last edited by Coach : 12-12-2008 at 06:34 AM. Reason: Changed "legend" to "legends".
 
Old 12-12-2008, 06:53 AM   #516
Darrell E. White
Member Darrell E. White is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: bay village  OH
Posts: 955
Re: T-Nation, Shugart and the Truth About CrossFit

Anyone wondering why it was a good thing to have this thread bumped back up need only read Coach's post from this morning. Clear and concise, actionable definitions. Clear and concise rationale for GPP (where, when, and why) for elite athletic specialists. Let's all remember this post and simply cut and paste it into all of those other threads...

Hey Coach, don't be a stranger here, OK?!

-bingo
 
Old 12-12-2008, 07:00 AM   #517
David Wood
Departed David Wood is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Oct 2002
 
Posts: 3,303
Re: T-Nation, Shugart and the Truth About CrossFit

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Long View Post
asymptote  /ˈćsɪmˌtoʊt/ [as-im-toht]

–noun Mathematics. a straight line approached by a given curve as one of the variables in the equation of the curve approaches infinity.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Origin:
1650–60; < Gk asýmptōtos, equiv. to a- a- 6 + sýmptōtos falling together (sym- sym- + ptōtós falling, deriv. of ptō-, var. s. of píptein to fall + -tos verbid suffix)

Ok, I know I'm the village idiot around here, but how does the word coach used "asymptote" relate to working out? (Keep it simple, single sylable words only, please.)

The asymptote of a curve is the value that it approaches (the output) as some other component (typically, the input) gets bigger and bigger.


For me, at 160 pounds BW, the "asymptote" of my DL would probably be around 450 or (maybe) 500 pounds. I've brought it up to 415 without serious focus, but progress has slowed . . . . I'd be surprised if I could ever get it past 500, even with serious effort.

In Coach's use of the word, it sounds like he was making a quick projection from observing a sample of folks and what they had achieved in 2 years of CrossFit, and estimating what a very large population of such people might obtain . . . that reaching 750 in two years would be pretty much the limit of obtainable performance.

Coincidentally, he was also observing that 500 - 750 is also the upper bound for an "athletic" deadlift . . . in the sense that DL performance beyond this range requires serious specialization on the lift, and would not be compatible with the wider-ranging performance that we're trying to develop.

The two meanings (one direct, one indirect) sort of converge in the notion of "asymptote" as the idea of a limit that one can approach but not surpass.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Asymptote.jpg
Views:	329
Size:	23.9 KB
ID:	3046  
 
Old 12-12-2008, 08:29 AM   #518
Coach
Founding Father Coach is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Aug 2003
 
Posts: 391
Re: T-Nation, Shugart and the Truth About CrossFit

David, thank you. I'd held off hoping our resident PhD Mathematician would step-up. I didn't want to embarrass myself (smile).

You're exactly right. It seemed to me that the number of folks hitting the 500 mark was growing faster than the program. I was seeing a clustering of max values around 450 locally, then 500 as we grew outside of Santa Cruz, then 550+ as we developed nationally, ....I took 750 as a dead reckoning high end based on the apparent clustering and decreasing velocity of the figure's increase. I had one guy hit that mark who CF'd and was a very capable CF'er.

I'd also worked with powerlifters and noticed that around 3.5 times body-weight deadlift the general athletic capacity of the lifter/athlete fell precipitously. It's my sense of things that we'll someday see a CF'er place high at the games with a 700 lb and change deadlift but not 800.

Or maybe the number is 700?

I've got a similar sense of the backsquat but I better keep these thoughts and numbers to myself (bigger smile).
 
Old 12-12-2008, 08:29 AM   #519
Bob Long
Member Bob Long is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Bruning  NE
Posts: 234
Re: T-Nation, Shugart and the Truth About CrossFit

David (Moderator) Thanks. I sort of understand now. The graph was a great help. Sorry I'm so dense. Thanks again.
 
Old 12-12-2008, 09:23 AM   #520
Aushion Chatman
Affiliate Aushion Chatman is offline
 
Aushion Chatman's Avatar
 
Profile:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Diego  CA
Posts: 3,342
Re: T-Nation, Shugart and the Truth About CrossFit

Yeah so I think the lesson learned here is to start some $#!T to get Coach to post.

Props to Brandon, Phillip, Jared, etc...I appreciate it
 
Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Crossfit-Like Program on Testosterone Nation Website wih link Kevin J. Fleming Exercises 0 07-31-2008 07:12 AM
Truth or B.S.? Larry Wright Nutrition 3 03-02-2008 03:18 AM
The Real Crossfit Nation James Besenyei Community 16 02-28-2007 06:46 PM
Thankfully Sonnon has finally revealed the truth about CrossFit Ryan Abbott Community 14 04-18-2006 09:23 AM
The truth about people David Heyer Fitness 13 08-08-2003 03:06 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CrossFit is a registered trademark of CrossFit Inc.