CrossFit Discussion Board  

Go Back   CrossFit Discussion Board > CrossFit Forum > Exercises
CrossFit Home Forum Site Rules CrossFit FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Exercises Movements, technique & proper execution

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-19-2006, 05:52 AM   #1
Mathew F. Bunch
Member Mathew F. Bunch is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fort Campbell  Kentucky
Posts: 85
this is in reference to the 15 august wod caption: i wonder if back extensions and regular sit-ups are a good indicator of strength/endurance discrepency. one starts horizontal and ends vertical, getting easier through the range of motion while the other starts vertical and ends horizontal. even that oversimplifies the difference as part of the trunk is supported during the first half of the sit-up (with the exception of ghd situps) so there is less of a load on the stomach muscles than during the back extension where the load is constant.

i would think a better comparison would be vertical situps (hanging from a bar or strapped into an inversion board) versus the back extension or regular situps versus good mornings without weight.

moreover, i have noticed the opposite discrepency when doing ghd sit-ups versus ghd back extensions-i can do about 20 proper situps versus about 55-60 back extensions.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2006, 08:34 AM   #2
Steven Low
Member Steven Low is offline
 
Steven Low's Avatar
 
Profile:
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: silver spring  maryland
Posts: 12,221
Interesting observation. I think you're right. The posterior chain is usually stronger with more endurance overall in general. The only thing that seems to be able to get anterior dominated are the shoulders/chest/rotator cuffs and quads, and that's only with excessive exercise towards the imbalances.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2006, 11:49 AM   #3
Ross Hunt
Member Ross Hunt is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Annapolis  MD
Posts: 914
IMO, the discrepancy reported on the front page is surprising, and probably does have a lot to do with the 'rest' during the sit-up.

I wonder how the ratios would look (for CrossFitters or for other athletes) when strength rather than strength endurance is compared in the two exercises. I've done weighted glute-ham sit-ups, and let me tell you, they're HARDER than back extensions. The range of motion is just so much huger. The back extension actually seems quite comparable to the glute-ham sit-up in difficulty if I only lower my torso to parallel to the ground on the sit-up, pausing there for a moment-- it's getting from hip angle at ~225 degrees to hip angle at 180 degrees that's the killer.

I haven't done the glute-hams for a while, though. Those mess with my back, even with proper extension of the leg.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2006, 02:46 AM   #4
John Seiler
Affiliate John Seiler is offline
 
John Seiler's Avatar
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: St. Louis  MO
Posts: 1,687
"One comment on the discrepancy...we ran this challenge by first having everyone to a static hold. Once the challenge was completed we had everyone do a max sit up and max back ext effort. So with Cill only getting 57 back extension we must say that she may well of have had more if she had not had just completed a 2:20 sec hold. There is no doubt that most of us are deficient in our back ext....and will start to rememdy..thanks coach"

Comment #102 - Posted by hollis at August 15, 2006 10:16 AM

I found this comment to be most intriguing. It doesn't matter too much to me as I'm weak in both areas so will gladly work on any defiency. Still, I be interested to hear some follow-up on it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2006, 07:55 AM   #5
Roger Harrell
Affiliate Roger Harrell is offline
 
Roger Harrell's Avatar
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Rafael  CA
Posts: 2,318
In a weighted back extension you can get more of a whip than in a weighted glute ham situp (dependant on how you're doing the weighting and how flexible your shoulders are). This makes the back extension a bit easier when weighted, so it may be more of a mechanics thing.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Back Extensions & Lower Back Injuries Jason Donaldson Exercises 20 06-04-2008 08:02 PM
CF North standards -- strength vs. strength endurance John Frazer Fitness 5 09-03-2006 07:40 PM
Strength endurance vs power endurance Kurt Ronald Mueller Fitness 4 03-13-2006 01:39 PM
Stamina-not really strength and not really endurance Christopher M Combs Fitness 23 07-06-2005 04:17 PM
Strength vs Endurance Frank C Ollis Fitness 12 03-06-2003 11:09 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CrossFit is a registered trademark of CrossFit Inc.