CrossFit Discussion Board  

Go Back   CrossFit Discussion Board > CrossFit Forum > Fitness
CrossFit Home Forum Site Rules CrossFit FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Fitness Theory and Practice. CrossFit's rationale & foundations. Who is fit? What is fitness?

Thread Tools
Old 01-29-2008, 12:02 PM   #1
Amber Brooks
Member Amber Brooks is offline
Amber Brooks's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Foley  AL
Posts: 21
'Cindy' Question

I am a newbie so be patient I did 'Cindy' for the first time Monday (it was my 2nd official CF day) I did the Buttercup scaled down version. Overall in my 10 minutes I did 19 rounds

1 Jumping Pull-ups
4 Push-ups
7 Squats

By Now you are probably wondering where the question is, well you are in luck. Here it is, is 19 rds up to par? Should I move up the scale to puppies? Im not really sure what to think about the work out since Im not really sure what Im aiming for goal wise for the individual WOD. any help/suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
The difference between the impossible and the possible lies in a person's determination.Tommy Lasorda
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2008, 12:13 PM   #2
Sean Dunston
Affiliate Sean Dunston is offline
Sean Dunston's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Alexandria  VA
Posts: 5,759
Re: 'Cindy' Question

19 sounds pretty good.

You'll see that the people who do CF as RX'd will be cranking out that many (and more ) rounds of Cindy.

I am not a trainer, so I don't know what the scaling methodology is. perhaps you are good at these movements, but there might be others in CF that do not come as easy to you. Give it a few more WODs before you dive in head first. It is better to have a good experience with your WODs than a bad one.

Next time Cindy comes up, if you do the same modifications from RX'd and get 25 rounds, then I would definitely say it is time to move up.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2008, 12:49 PM   #3
Scott A Martin
Member Scott A Martin is offline
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Saratoga Springs  NY
Posts: 342
Re: 'Cindy' Question

Nice job. You were doing one rep every 2.6 seconds. That's pretty solid (it would work out to over 15 rounds on Cindy as prescribed if you maintained that pace). I would scale up as long as the primary limiting factor is your conditioning and not your strength. If you scale up and find that you're spending a lot of time struggling to get x pull ups or y push ups, then scale back down. Remember that the point of WOD's like Cindy is primarily metcon and not strength training.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2008, 05:44 PM   #4
Andrew G. Greenberg
Member Andrew G. Greenberg is offline
Andrew G. Greenberg's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Charlotte  NC
Posts: 623
Re: 'Cindy' Question

amber, you are way ready to move up to the next level. if you can get 10 rounds or more, then move up again.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2008, 06:07 PM   #5
John Biddle
Member John Biddle is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Brisbane  QLD
Posts: 139
Re: 'Cindy' Question

Can I suggest that you make sure that you're doing the exercises with a full range of movement before going up? As you get more tired you can find yourself unconsciously using less and less good form (I know I certainly have done) which makes Cindy a much less nasty beast.
  Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Cindy? Aaron Cargile Workout of the Day 2 11-09-2007 12:24 PM
Cindy Derek Maffett Workout of the Day 2 08-24-2007 04:37 PM
Cindy Steve Sheffar Testimonials 2 03-24-2007 09:41 AM
First Cindy Richard Paul Ham-Williams Workout of the Day 22 02-19-2006 01:09 PM
Cindy PR Charlie Reid Testimonials 16 12-06-2005 10:15 AM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CrossFit is a registered trademark of CrossFit Inc.