CrossFit Discussion Board  

Go Back   CrossFit Discussion Board > CrossFit Forum > Exercises
CrossFit Home Forum Site Rules CrossFit FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Exercises Movements, technique & proper execution

Thread Tools
Old 09-29-2004, 05:55 AM   #1
Paul Theodorescu
Member Paul Theodorescu is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Quebec  Quebec
Posts: 685
Is it common that thruster strength supercedes C&J strength? In today's workout I actually found it easier to thrust the weight up than to jerk it, especially when it came to multiple reps. (My legs were wide apart and angled out so I could get in the bottom squat position--my legs are close together when I jerk)
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2004, 09:22 AM   #2
Ross Greenberg
Departed Ross Greenberg is offline
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 98
I don't think it's common, because although not that many people do clean and jerks, clean and jerks are a lot more common than thrusters. You get good at what you practice. Since I do a lot of thrusters I can thruster out of a squat clean about the same amount of weight as I jerk from standing up. It's my fault, I don't really practice jerks that much, and consequently they have fallen far behind what I can clean. My clean is around 200 lbs, my jerk is around 160. Nevertheless, jerks seem to me to have a lot more potential than thrusters in terms of max weight because the short dipping motion is easier than squatting all the way down and the split lunge thing that you do means you don't have to drive the weight all the way up as in a thruster.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2004, 11:45 AM   #3
Robert Wolf
Member Robert Wolf is offline
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chico  CA
Posts: 2,669
I suspect it is a technique issue. Perhaps the more experienced O-lifter can chime in here (Lincoln,Dan) but personally thruster #'s are miles from my push jerk and even further from the split jerk.

BTW- Paul, try to work a moderately narrow stance. This will allow a longer range of motion and over all a better stimulus. You will have to drop the weight for a while but the benefits will be worht it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2004, 10:31 AM   #4
Lincoln Brigham
Member Lincoln Brigham is offline
Lincoln Brigham's Avatar
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Kirkland  WA
Posts: 3,987
If the lifter has technical errors on the "dip-drive-dip" portion of the jerk, then thruster numbers could indeed be higher.

Common errors for the jerk are:
Horizontal movement in the bar path.
Dip is too long and stalls.
Hips going back on the initial dip. ("J" shape bar path on initial dip.)
Bar separation from shoulders during dip and bouncing on/off the shoulders
Start of jerk with bar supported by the hands instead of the shoulders.
  Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Subbing dumbbell thrusters for barbell thrusters Sean Manseau Exercises 4 08-12-2006 10:27 PM
95 # thrusters Laurent Huor Exercises 7 02-13-2006 11:42 PM
Thrusters Dennis Yiatras Injuries 2 01-26-2006 03:42 AM
Thrusters Christopher C Brophy Exercises 3 12-16-2005 10:54 AM
Thrusters John Velandra Exercises 2 11-11-2005 07:06 PM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:37 AM.

CrossFit is a registered trademark of CrossFit Inc.