CrossFit Discussion Board  

Go Back   CrossFit Discussion Board > CrossFit Forum > Fitness
CrossFit Home Forum Site Rules CrossFit FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Fitness Theory and Practice. CrossFit's rationale & foundations. Who is fit? What is fitness?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-28-2006, 08:03 PM   #1
John Daniel
Member John Daniel is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Louis  MO
Posts: 70
I really liked Dave Werner's standards he created. I noticed that for any given level, some of the standards appeared much easier for me than a different one at the same level. Does this help illustrate my weaknesses? Or are they "unbalanced"?

For example, at level 2, 30 pushups, 100 squats, bw squat, mp 1/2 bw, bp bw, 1:45 row, and some others are not a major problem. However, 60 continuous 24kg kb snatches and a muscle up are BIG challenges for me.

Would these weaknesses be good ones to attack? I had been focusing on a few others like the DL, which I can complete the Level 2 DL; but not about 5 others.

Also, pull ups are kipping right?
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2006, 08:19 PM   #2
Butch White
Departed Butch White is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jan 1970
 
Posts: 120
Yes... your weaknesses uncovered by these standards should be the ones you attack. I'm in the same boat as you John. I'm good with most of the Intermediate standards but the 30 24kg KB snatches with each arm AND the 45 1/2 BW Thrusters are two I'm going to focus upon... those two I don't "own" just yet.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2006, 08:21 AM   #3
Roger Harrell
Affiliate Roger Harrell is offline
 
Roger Harrell's Avatar
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Rafael  CA
Posts: 2,318
I think that the list is going to appear unbalanced to most people, because most people are specialized somewhat. It's hard for me to look at the list not think that the handstand/rope/gymnastics type of exercises are far too easy compared to some of the other things.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2006, 09:00 AM   #4
John Velandra
Member John Velandra is offline
 
John Velandra's Avatar
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Fayetteville  NC
Posts: 710
How were these standards derived? What makes them Lv1-4? Based on???

Don't get me wrong, I love the idea and now have something to strive towards (way too many things to strive towards - lol), but am curious.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2006, 09:18 AM   #5
Mike Kirkpatrick
Member Mike Kirkpatrick is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Talladega  Alabama
Posts: 77
The 45 reps of 1/2 Bodyweight DB Thrusters is pretty hardcore for anyone.

I weigh 193lbs, and that is going to be very difficult for me to achieve.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 03:43 AM   #6
Allen Yeh
Member Allen Yeh is offline
 
Allen Yeh's Avatar
 
Profile:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: reston  va
Posts: 768
Mike,

Take a look at David Werner answer in regards to the thrusters:

"That one may turn out to be too tough, but right now I think not. 45 thrusters at 1/2 bodyweight is less than the requirements of Fran - minus the pullups. There is no time constraint, although it should be done in one set, so "resting" at the bottom is allowed.

A more imortant point though is that many people are not doing thrusters right. The bar should be racked on the shoulders, not carried in the hands, and the movement should not be a press. Done correctly, hip power drives the bar with enough momentum to carry the bar all the way to the top. On the way down, the athlete opens their hands and deposits the bar back on the shoulders in a good front squat rack.

I realize that the requirement is a lot of work, that is the point. It is consistent though with the 1/2 bodyweight MP requirement. Thrusters are not like military presses.

Doing the same thing with dumbells is much harder, a very different beast. The trick to mastering this is to get your form on thrusters (and front squats) right.

Regards
Dave Werner
Crossfit North"

From this thread:
http://www.crossfit.com/discus/messages/21/24423.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 04:59 AM   #7
Jason Steele
Member Jason Steele is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Radford  VA
Posts: 335
Allen is correct, if done correctly, 1/2 bw thrusters really aren't that bad (I am working up to the 45 though). I weight over 200, so I feel your pain Mike.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 11:04 AM   #8
Aushion Chatman
Affiliate Aushion Chatman is offline
 
Aushion Chatman's Avatar
 
Profile:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Diego  CA
Posts: 3,342
Yeah that one seemed particularly tough to me too,...I'm pushing the scale at 198 last weigh-in. I just did a WOD with 25, 19, 10 thrusters at 105# (and deads at 225#) and I had to break up the first 25...of course that was different pacing...

Can resting in the bottom really help? Seems like you'd want to just keep going to me. I guess I can see it during your last 1-3 reps...

Aush
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2006, 08:02 AM   #9
Kim Chase
Member Kim Chase is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Helena  MT
Posts: 42
First post here. Hi! :-) This is really neat. I can already pick out my strengths and weaknesses, with just a couple of months of CF under my belt. Strong hips. Who knew?!

I was just curious... why the gender-based scaling for some items (rowing), but not others (running, pullups, vertical jump)? Are things like pullups and muscle-ups (!) considered self-scaling because of weight? (Darn, I wish I was one of those sleek, 120 lb girls!) It just seems like most women would have an easier time getting as fast as a man in something like rowing, than gaining upper body strength as well as a man.... Thanks!
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2006, 09:09 AM   #10
David Werner
Affiliate David Werner is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Seattle  WA
Posts: 399
Kim

Rowing power is very dependant on mass, the standards are set for light-weight men and women, and are developed from times recorded on the concept 2 web site. Light weight means less than 165 pounds for men and less than 135 pounds for women. Those 30 pounds make a big difference!

Larger folks have complained a little about some of the standards - the 1/2 body-weight thrusters in particular, but this is one standard where larger people have a distinct advantage.

On a related note, body composition is clearly a component of being fit and yet I didn't mention it anywhere in the skill levels. The issue will be forced however, as some of the tasks will require decent body composition to complete. Both for performance and health we really want a good strength to weight ratio.

Regards

Dave Werner
Crossfit North
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Crossfit North Athletic Standards? Corey Hatton Fitness 5 04-05-2011 09:17 AM
Crossfit North Standards Again Russ Greene Fitness 49 06-15-2009 10:07 PM
Crossfit North Standards Craig Van De Walker Fitness 12 08-03-2007 04:03 PM
Crossfit North Skill standards - accuracy? Ken Mindoro Fitness 1 07-03-2007 12:50 PM
Crossfit North Athletic Standards Michael Manseau Exercises 2 01-01-2007 03:32 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CrossFit is a registered trademark of CrossFit Inc.