CrossFit Discussion Board  

Go Back   CrossFit Discussion Board > CrossFit Forum > Digital Coaching
CrossFit Home Forum Site Rules CrossFit FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Digital Coaching Post pictures or movies for critique and coaching

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-16-2005, 07:19 AM   #1
Anthony Papadopoulos
Member Anthony Papadopoulos is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: athens  glyfada
Posts: 43
are those squats below parallel or just parallel?
any tips on form?
http://s28.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=2...Z128SXP2DMDGCQ

file is opened with latest version of quicktime
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2005, 08:23 AM   #2
Anthony Bainbridge
Affiliate Anthony Bainbridge is offline
 
Anthony Bainbridge's Avatar
 
Profile:
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Fredericton  New Brunswick
Posts: 3,886
They look above parallel, but it's hard to say for sure from that angle.

The crease of your hip has to be at or below the top of your knee to be considered parallel in the IPF.

As for form, in this particular video, I think the lockout is too forceful and it almost looks like he's close to hyperextending his knees. It also looks like the weight is pretty unstable, which probably means weak core. Other than that, it looks pretty decent.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2005, 07:20 PM   #3
Jerry Hill
Affiliate Jerry Hill is offline
 
Jerry Hill's Avatar
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Alexandria  VA
Posts: 649
Those squats look pretty good to me - he is using bands that will cause instability - is it on a smith machine?

  Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2005, 07:40 PM   #4
Anthony Bainbridge
Affiliate Anthony Bainbridge is offline
 
Anthony Bainbridge's Avatar
 
Profile:
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Fredericton  New Brunswick
Posts: 3,886
It's not a smith machine, it's a power rack. But you're right about the bands - I completely missed those. I take back my comment on being unstable.

Still above parallel though. :p
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2005, 09:48 AM   #5
Anthony Bainbridge
Affiliate Anthony Bainbridge is offline
 
Anthony Bainbridge's Avatar
 
Profile:
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Fredericton  New Brunswick
Posts: 3,886
Hmm, I was wrong. Those aren't bands, it's a smith machine that slides forward/backwards.

If that's the case, I'll stand by my original comment - a bit too close to hyperextension on the lockout and the weight looks unstable.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2005, 09:53 PM   #6
Adam C Lautenschlager
Member Adam C Lautenschlager is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bethesda  Maryland
Posts: 59
Speaking of squatting form and depth, I'm confused about what seems to be an "unspoken standard" here in Crossfit land. What I'm referring to is squatting (during Thrusters, Tabatas, BW squats etc.) onto a Dynamax. I personally don't engage in that practice, not only because I don't have a Dynamax, but I feel it might limit ROM; and I'm 6'2" and not very flexible. I think especially for shorter athletes it may even limit ROM to paralell, or above, which isn't really acceptable if we're going for maximum benefit from this hugely functional exercise. I understand if you're going for a PR on "Tabata something else" or "Cindy" it's good to have a widely accepted standard, but only if it's a good standard.

Whaddaya think?






All views and opinions expressed herein subject to change, author cannot be held liable for misuse of information.
:proud:

  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 04:25 PM   #7
Ben Krey
Departed Ben Krey is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jan 1970
 
Posts: 123
I think the squats could certainly be a little lower, but all in all, pretty good form.
Trying to keep the upper body more upright would help I think. I couldn't see the position of the bar or feet. It would be interesting to see at more of an oblique angle with no cage.

As for what you said, Adam, I think you are pretty acurate regarding getting maximum benefit. I always thought of the Dynamax thing as a progression on the way toward rock bottom-ness.
Anthony, I see what you mean about the knee thing, but I do like how he gets full hip ext. at the top.
Idunno, don't listen to me, lol.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 05:24 PM   #8
Anthony Papadopoulos
Member Anthony Papadopoulos is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: athens  glyfada
Posts: 43
i think those are deeper but those are triples... because i couldn't get any deeper... my *** was hitting my calves...
http://s61.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=2...T0Y8TUTR07Y096

(148kg 2x3reps @ 69kg bw,1.75m).
i keep my torso very tight. i am not unstable at all i think.... i am contracting my TVA as hard as i can . i am also trying to be as more upright as possible. check it out.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2005, 01:05 PM   #9
Anthony Bainbridge
Affiliate Anthony Bainbridge is offline
 
Anthony Bainbridge's Avatar
 
Profile:
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Fredericton  New Brunswick
Posts: 3,886
Anthony, I think your depth looks better in this video. Good stuff!
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Squat depth Jay Cohen Exercises 6 07-22-2007 03:23 AM
Squat Depth Josh Brehm Exercises 2 12-15-2006 08:16 PM
Depth in the C&J Graham Tidey Exercises 2 07-06-2006 06:48 AM
Squats/Form Matt McCollum Exercises 8 02-27-2006 09:19 AM
Squat depth vs deadlift depth Tim Morrison Exercises 7 01-27-2005 07:46 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CrossFit is a registered trademark of CrossFit Inc.