CrossFit Discussion Board  

Go Back   CrossFit Discussion Board > Community > Community
CrossFit Home Forum Site Rules CrossFit FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Community Catch all category for CrossFit community discussion.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-20-2006, 07:54 AM   #1
Mark Gebhard
Member Mark Gebhard is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin  TX
Posts: 186
Forgive my poor reading comprehension, but how do you interpret rule 2 for link posting (2. Indicate if it's not work safe/family friendly in the message title.)? To me that reads that you only need to indicate if a link is not safe. If it's safe/friendly then you don't need to say that. This interpretation seems to be confirmed by Lynne in this thread:
http://www.crossfit.com/discus/messages/23/32940.html
yet it looks to be refuted here:
http://www.crossfit.com/discus/messages/22/34210.html.

So which is the correct method?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2006, 09:30 AM   #2
Travis Hall
Departed Travis Hall is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Jun 2009
 
Posts: 647
either way rule 3 states you have to summarize the link.

t.

  Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2006, 09:48 AM   #3
Mark Gebhard
Member Mark Gebhard is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin  TX
Posts: 186
Right, of course there should be a summary of the link content, which seems to make a [work safe/family friendly] tag all the more unnecessary.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2006, 02:32 PM   #4
Ted Williams
Member Ted Williams is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Jose  CA
Posts: 381
Do we need to reference if the links within the link referenced are work/family safe? Or is it assumed that most of us can figure out what might be work/family safe :g: And what if we are posting a link to another thread within the forum, like Mark did above? :wink:

  Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2006, 04:29 PM   #5
Mark Gebhard
Member Mark Gebhard is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin  TX
Posts: 186
Yes, just to be safe, I should have indicated that those two links are work/family safe.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2006, 04:58 PM   #6
Lynne Pitts
Administrator Lynne Pitts is offline
 
Lynne Pitts's Avatar
 
Profile:
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Richmond  NH
Posts: 3,231
The rule was initiated primarily for those folks who would post thus:

"Hey look at this" (linkage), thereby indicating neither the subject, its applicabilty, or its appropriateness. This is annoying since nobody knows what it's about, if it's of interest, etc.

Application of the rule receives some slack if a link is in the midst of a thread, such that the context of what it might be is clear, or if from the link name it's easy to assess content or safety (performancemenu.com, mikesgym.com, crossfit.com, etc.)

And no, redundant disclaimers on subsequent references to a link in the same thread are not necessary.

This is all about common sense and courtesy. Not everyone (especially folks on dial-up) has the time or inclination to indulge in "hey, check this out." So, tell 'em: "hey, check out this link about the new framus widget being marketed as a functional fitness tool." Now they know if they want to bother. And, say if it's safe for kids or bosses, to keep everyone out of trouble. Again, simple, common courtesy.

As a note: despite what some paranoid crossfit bashers have whined about on a familiar board, there is no requirement that only family-friendly links be posted. The only requirement is that an indication is provided, so that people can make an informed decision as to whether they want to follow the link.

[edited to add: there are perfectly safe articles on sites that are not work/family friendly due to their pictures, ads, etc., like many of the freebie video sites, t-mag, etc., so a content summary does not necessarily indicate the work-safeness of the site it's on. Thus the request for a summary and a safeness rating.]

Does this clarify?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2006, 08:46 PM   #7
Mark Gebhard
Member Mark Gebhard is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin  TX
Posts: 186
Sure, sounds good. Just wanted a clarification cause that one thread stuck in my memory for some reason.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Posting Ben Kates Starting 8 08-14-2007 07:36 PM
Link Posting Rules Lynne Pitts Announcements 0 10-20-2006 03:47 PM
Posting to Comments Kurt Holm Workout of the Day 13 07-28-2006 04:50 AM
New here-2nd posting Harold gilbert Cureau Starting 6 04-12-2004 12:43 PM
Pre-posting wod Larry Lindenman Workout of the Day 1 02-17-2004 01:00 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CrossFit is a registered trademark of CrossFit Inc.