![]() |
|
Fitness Theory and Practice. CrossFit's rationale & foundations. Who is fit? What is fitness? |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
![]() |
Elite crossfit athlete development theory
I admire and wish to emulate all of these elite athletes we see in the crossfit games. But several thoughts come to mind when i watch their performance. It seems the vast majority come from elite specialized backgrounds that foster their success.
Examples would be Josh Everetts Oly lifting experience, Rob Orlandos strongman background, and Welbournes Pro NFL days. I love crossfit as much as the next person, but, am playing the devils advocate here. We use these athletes as the poster children for crossfit, yet, most of them were achievers in a more traditional sport. the question then becomes... can one develop that elite level of performance in the crossfit games, relying solely on a crossfit program and background? unless i were an olympic lifter or strongman in a past life, can i expect to ever compete at that level, by grinding away at my local box? in effect, the real question becomes.. is crossfit responsible for these athletes, or are the athletes responsible for crossfit? food for thought. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
![]() |
Re: Elite crossfit athlete development theory
Quote:
First is that people who are in some way physically gifted are better at sports or a particular sport, thus receiving more enjoyment and rewards from it, and having more people willing to encourage, coach, etc them. They are more likely to find a sport they're good at and keep at it until they get to the point where really good training becomes available. Second is that lifelong athletes will develop higher-order skillsets, and will develop their physical and mental qualities over the course of years and decades, and these years of work carryover in ways both obvious and non-obvious. There are physical adaptations that simply take time to accumulate, and no amount of training in the short term will develop them in the way that they are developed in lifelong athletes. There are physical attributes that will never develop, no matter what you do. Where you drew the short straw genetically, no amount of training will produce superhuman results. If you're completely new to athletics, chances are you'll never be an elite athlete. But choosing sound programming and developing a strong work ethic will make you the strongest, fastest, etc you that you can be. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
![]() |
Re: Elite crossfit athlete development theory
As long as you're strong as ****, like most of those guys you mentioned are, then you should be able to become an elite crossfitter as long as you practice and get real good at all the skill work. I mean look at Mikko. As far as I know he did not participate in elite level sports. Getting strong is the key!
|
__________________
"If you do not believe you can, they you have no chance at all." -Arsene Wenger- |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Banned
![]() |
Re: Elite crossfit athlete development theory
Just spit balling here so excuse my ramblings.
I'm starting to feel like as crossfit becomes more of a "sport" there are really two crossfits. There's the crossfit that is for general fitness where someone who will probably never compete can go to a box or do it at home and use crossfit to become a very "fit" person. Then there's the crossfit of the games where it has become very specialized and almost more of a skill in itself. As a very loose comparison I think of some of the powerlifters that I read about that barely use the three lifts of competition to train, up until a little bit out from competition. I think a good way to approach the second type of crossfit is going to be to go about it kind of backwards, and maybe counter to what CF would say. I think it would be good to focus on and achieve a high level of various skills separately and afterwards work on the "skill" of crossfit. So work on getting a big deadlift, squat, overhead press. Then work on getting a big clean and jerk. Forcus on getting a super fast 400m and 1 mile run, etc. Once you've achieved these then work on getting good at crossfit, which I think would take the smallest amount of time to do compared to the other skills. I think this will be a good way to be really good at crossfit, but I think it would take longer than most people are willing to stay with it. I'm actually experimenting with this on myself in sort of a multi-phase approach. I'm keeping track of it all and if it ends up working i'll make sure to post it. Even if it doesn't I'll post the results. Like I said though...it might take a while. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Affiliate
![]() |
Re: Elite crossfit athlete development theory
Quote:
lol ![]() |
|
__________________
|Deadlift 220kgs|Strict press 75kgs|squat 162.5kgs|pullups 67|477 double unders|26rounds cindy| 2:28 Fran|6:08 annie|12 rnd NATE|full snatch 95kg|C+J 110kg| |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Banned
![]() |
Re: Elite crossfit athlete development theory
Haha. If it only took 15 minutes I think I'd start peddling my own program and be OPRAH RICH!
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
![]() |
Re: Elite crossfit athlete development theory
I don't think the CF elite are putting up the numbers they are because they used to be in some unrelated specialty, but rather because they have been pushing their bodies physically for 15-20+ years.
Think about it... all those guys are in the ballpark of 30 years old, and have been heavily involved in athletics since high school or before. NOTHING builds strength/endurance/mental toughness/cardo capacity like 20 years of working hard several days a week. Could you get the the level of the games just by working out at a CF affiliate? yeah you could, if you started at 10 years old and were getting special coaching and competing in it from day 1. We don't see that because 10 year olds would be a lot more likely to be playing football, soccer, wresting, track, or whatever than competing in a CF gym. Plus, the current elite were 10 in 1990 when CF was completely unknown. Hell, the archives only go back to '03. |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||
Affiliate
![]() |
Re: Elite CrossFit athlete development theory
Quote:
Quote:
CrossFit is responsible for taking already developed athletes and turning them into elite CrossFitters. I haven't met many strong men that can survive past about the 4 minute mark in a met-con. I expect Rob O. spent much of his early days in CrossFit working on developing metabolic capacity. |
||
__________________
Nomadic CrossFit Coach |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
![]() |
Re: Elite crossfit athlete development theory
It's really simple.
It doesn't matter what the sport is. CrossFit isn't magic. Not everyone is a winner, and CrossFit cannot make you a winner. |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Evolution of the Crossfit Athlete | Christopher Brophy | Fitness | 2 | 08-11-2013 10:36 PM |
elite athlete injury experience? | Timothy Roach | Injuries | 0 | 01-09-2009 02:41 PM |
Defying the crossfit hierarchy of development | Andres Diaz | Fitness | 23 | 12-22-2006 08:26 AM |
Endurance Athlete New to Crossfit | Stacy Junio | Starting | 10 | 07-31-2006 10:16 AM |
A Problem with the Theory of Crossfit? | Travis John Mulroy | Fitness | 13 | 08-14-2003 12:47 PM |